Add Row

Add Element

update

Kozi Checks & Balances
Media Site Home

update

Add Element

Categories

Add Row

Add Element

update

Kozi Checks & Balances TaxTactics News

update

December 13.2024

2 Minutes Read

Rising Taxes in 2026? How Baselines and the TCJA Impact Your Wallet

Professional man smiling confidently, TCJA expiration context.

Understanding the Budgetary Baseline Debate

Taxes might soon rise for millions of Americans if Congress doesn't act by January 1, 2026. This is because the provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) are set to expire. While lawmakers discuss ways to address this potential cliff, the approach to measuring the budgetary impact of extending these cuts is a hot topic. Sen. Mike Crapo suggests using a "current policy baseline" rather than the "current law baseline." This means planning for future budgets as if extending the TCJA tax cuts would have no additional impact on revenue.

The Impact on Taxpayers and Government Debt

If the TCJA isn't extended, a significant tax increase awaits nearly 62% of tax filers. On average, taxpayers could face a $2,853 hike with the expiration of individual provisions. However, if lawmakers adopt the current policy baseline for future budgeting, the deficits and national debt could rise as the extension would show zero immediate budget impact. Yet, this doesn't change the actual forecast for increased debt due to lower revenue under extended tax cuts, adding complexity to already intricate fiscal planning.

Why Should You Care?

Most taxpayers are unaware of the looming tax changes. Understanding the potential changes can help individuals better prepare for future financial planning. By learning about these baseline debates, you can have informed discussions and perhaps contribute to a community-wide awareness, ensuring everyone is better prepared for any financial shifts that may come their way.

Tax Deduction Deep-Dives

Write A Comment

Related Posts All Posts

08.06.2025

Exploring the Connection Between Cigarette Taxes and Smuggling Rates

Update Cigarette Taxes and Smuggling: A Growing Challenge Cigarette taxes have long been a controversial topic across the United States, but the latest findings indicate a troubling trend: as tax rates rise, so do instances of cigarette smuggling. A recent analysis of 2023 data shows California has overtaken New York as the leader in cigarette smuggling, with a staggering 52.5% of cigarettes consumed in the state reportedly purchased illegally. This shift marks a significant change in the smuggling landscape, underscoring the relationship between taxation and illicit trade. The Economic Implications of High Tax Rates Higher cigarette taxes are designed to deter smoking by making tobacco products less accessible; however, they inadvertently encourage smokers to seek cheaper options across borders. For instance, New York follows closely behind California with a smuggling rate of 51.8%. This pattern not only undermines tax revenue for state governments but also contributes to a burgeoning black market, negatively impacting local businesses and communities that comply with regulations. Border States at the Forefront States like Wyoming and Virginia demonstrate a different aspect of smuggling dynamics. With outbound smuggling rates reaching 55.0% and 47.9% respectively, these states attract consumers from higher-tax regions looking to evade steep fees. This cross-border shopping phenomenon highlights the complex interplay of state taxes and consumer behavior, raising questions about fairness and the effectiveness of tax policies designed to discourage smoking. Addressing the Smuggling Issue To combat cigarette smuggling, experts recommend a balanced approach that includes thoughtful taxation policies alongside enforcement measures against illegal sales. States must recognize the unintended consequences of high taxes and find innovative solutions that maintain public health goals while minimizing illegal trade. As state governments grapple with these issues, the challenge remains: how can they effectively tax tobacco while reducing smuggling rates and promoting legal purchasing? Understanding the implications of cigarette taxes is crucial for policymakers, businesses, and consumers alike. By addressing smuggling proactively, states can better protect their revenues, promote compliance, and support local communities.

07.31.2025

Understanding State Tax Implications of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

Update The Impacts of the One Big Beautiful Bill on State Taxes The recently enacted One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) introduces significant changes to federal tax policies, many of which ripple through to state tax codes across the country. This article aims to unpack these state tax implications in a way that is accessible and clear for all readers. Understanding State Conformity to Federal Tax Reforms States typically align their tax codes with the Internal Revenue Code, which means changes at the federal level can directly impact state income tax systems. In the case of the OBBBA, some states may incorporate the new provisions outright while others might opt to decouple from certain elements. This decision-making process will largely dictate how quickly and effectively state tax policies can respond to the changes introduced by the bill. Personal Deductions and State Property Tax Changes Among the most essential provisions is the increase in personal deductions, particularly the enhanced temporary standard deduction for seniors and other specific deductions. States leveraging federal taxable income for their own tax calculations will see these adjustments flow through, potentially resulting in notable shifts in state revenue. For example, 18 states have already anticipated adjusting their property tax deductions to align with these new federal standards. Business Expensing Provisions: A Growth Opportunity The renewed emphasis on full expensing for machinery and equipment is poised to have a significant economic impact across 17 states. By allowing businesses to deduct the full cost of qualified investments immediately, the OBBBA encourages more companies to invest in new technologies, thereby boosting productivity and job creation. This part of the bill could inspire states to revisit their tax incentives to foster an environment conducive to business growth. Looking Ahead: Future Predictions on Tax Revenue Beginning in fiscal year 2028, new limitations on Medicaid provider taxes are expected to reduce federal matching funds for states, which could present challenges for funding local healthcare initiatives. As these changes unfold, states will need to adeptly navigate their fiscal landscapes, adjusting their tax codes and strategies to maintain balance and ensure necessary revenue streams. Staying informed about these shifts in tax policy offers tremendous value. As taxpayers or business owners, understanding how the OBBBA influences state taxes can empower you to make more informed financial decisions and advocate for policies that support local economic growth.

07.25.2025

Understanding the Future of BEAT Tax and Its Global Impact

Update The Evolution and Future of the BEAT Tax As corporations navigate the complex US tax landscape, the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT) emerges as a focal point in discussions surrounding international corporate taxation. First introduced under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, BEAT serves as a mechanism specifically targeting multinational entities that deduct significant expenses linked to profit shifting—a practice that allows companies to sidestep US corporate tax obligations. However, recent legislative developments under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) have driven a renewed dialogue about the alignment and effectiveness of BEAT in curbing tax avoidance. Understanding BEAT: The Basics BEAT applies to large corporations with average annual receipts exceeding $500 million, particularly those whose base erosion payments reach 3% of their total deductions. This tax was initially set at a rate of 10%, slated to increase to 12.5% in 2026. However, the OBBBA has modified this trajectory by establishing a slightly higher BEAT rate of 10.5%, which, while seeming like an increase, does little to address the systemic issues it aims to solve. This creates a challenging environment for both domestic and foreign companies planning investments in the U.S. Challenges of Implementation and Hidden Flaws The intent behind BEAT is to identify and tax payments likely related to profit shifting, such as royalties and interest. Yet, the current framework neglects crucial considerations about the tax jurisdictions receiving these payments. By not accurately assessing whether these transactions are made to high-tax areas, BEAT risks punishing legitimate business operations and discouraging foreign direct investment more than it deters tax evasion. Future Implications of BEAT under OBBBA Despite initial proposals to revamp BEAT more thoroughly, the OBBBA leaves much unaltered, revealing a legislative struggle between protecting domestic tax revenue and fostering a competitive investment climate. The discarding of substantial changes, such as the punitive enforcement through Section 899, suggests an ongoing debate about how best to balance these two opposing aims. Why Understanding BEAT Matters Now The complexities surrounding BEAT will have lasting implications not only for multinational corporations but also for global economic relations. As investors scrutinize U.S. tax policy, clear communication and responsive modifications to legislation will be crucial in maintaining the nation’s attractiveness as a business destination. Engaging in informed discussions about BEAT and its role in international taxation is essential for business owners navigating this landscape.

Rising Taxes in 2026? How Baselines and the TCJA Impact Your Wallet

Understanding the Budgetary Baseline Debate

The Impact on Taxpayers and Government Debt

Why Should You Care?

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title