Add Row
Add Element
Kozi checks and balances
update

Kozi Checks & Balances
Media Site Home

cropper
update
Add Element
  • Categories
    • Kansas Tax Compliance
    • Audit-Proofing Strategies
    • Bookkeeping Basics
    • QuickBooks Optimization
    • Industry Insights
    • Tax Deduction Deep-Dives
    • Local Business Spotlights
    • Payroll Taxes
    • Business Directory
Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update
 Kozi Checks & Balances TaxTactics News 
cropper
update
March 19.2025
2 Minutes Read

How Will the Future of EU Tobacco Taxation Embrace Harm Reduction?

European Union flag representing EU Tobacco Taxation Future.

The Changing Landscape of EU Tobacco Taxation

As Europe stands on the brink of significant transformation in its tobacco taxation strategy, the anticipation grows for the upcoming updates to the EU Tobacco Excise Tax Directive (TED). With the European Council expected to unveil this vital update in 2025, it’s clear that member states must reassess their approach to tobacco taxation in light of innovative harm-reduction products.

Embracing Harm Reduction for a Healthier Future

The principle of harm reduction is gaining recognition across the EU, especially with Sweden leading the way. By advocating for products with reduced harm profiles, Sweden has been able to lower its smoking rates remarkably. Exploring this model can provide critical insights for other EU nations aiming to reduce health burdens associated with smoking while generating steady tax revenue.

Current Tax Structures and Challenges

The current framework mandates a minimum excise duty—€1.80 per pack of 20 cigarettes, alongside a requirement of 60% of the retail price. However, these rigid structures can drive consumers towards illicit markets where regulations do not exist. Hence, a more flexible tax structure that adjusts rates based on the harm classification of tobacco products can discourage illicit trade and steer consumers towards safer alternatives.

Integration of Risk-Reduced Products

The significant rise of risk-reduced products, such as e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products, poses an essential consideration for policymakers. While the TED currently includes some taxation measures for cigarettes, ignoring these alternatives could be a missed opportunity. Taxation should not only seek to deter consumption but should also incentivize the adoption of less harmful products, which can markedly improve public health outcomes.

Lessons from Sweden: A Case Study

Sweden's experience with snus, a smokeless tobacco alternative, provides a compelling model for the effectiveness of harm reduction in public policy. By fostering an environment where snus is preferred over combustion products, Sweden has successfully reduced its smoking rates to the lowest within the EU. This remarkable achievement underscores the importance of understanding consumer behavior and tailoring tax policies that favor less harmful options.

Conclusion: The Road Ahead for EU Tobacco Taxation

The upcoming revision of the Tobacco Excise Tax Directive represents an extraordinary opportunity for the EU to reshape its tobacco taxation policies towards public health enhancement. Embracing harm reduction, integrating risk-reduced products, and learning from member state experiences such as Sweden could cultivate a healthier future for European citizens. Policymakers must act with a forward-looking approach that prioritizes innovation over punitive taxation to make a real impact on public health.

Payroll Taxes

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
01.22.2026

How OBBBA Tax Cuts Could Transform the US Economy and Impact You

Update Understanding the Impact of OBBBA Tax Cuts on the US Economy The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) has reignited discussions about its potential to enhance the United States economy. Passed with a commitment to extend the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act’s provisions, these tax cuts promise to reduce individual tax burdens and incentivize economic growth. The Promising Projections of Economic Growth Proponents of the OBBBA argue that it could lead to a substantial boost in GDP, with estimates suggesting an increase by about 1.2% in the coming years. This is attributed largely to the extension of lower marginal tax rates on work, saving, and investment. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has upped its forecast predicting a strong GDP growth trajectory, reflecting a revised rosier outlook for 2026 and 2027. New Challenges Surpassing the Tax Cuts However, the realities of economic policy are intertwined with a myriad of challenges, including ongoing tariffs introduced during the previous administration. These tariffs are expected to offset some of the anticipated benefits of OBBBA, potentially reducing GDP growth by about 0.5%. Moreover, fluctuating immigration policies pose further challenges to labor market growth. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Boosting Growth Interestingly, the current surge in economic activity is being further propelled by breakthroughs in artificial intelligence (AI). Many economists believe the growing AI market is significantly contributing to GDP growth, highlighting the importance of technological advancement alongside tax policy reform. Barclays reported that nearly half of the growth seen in recent financial reports can be attributed to spending in this burgeoning sector. A Unique Opportunity for Businesses For local businesses, understanding OBBBA's details can lead to strategic opportunities. Lower tax rates and enhanced business expense deductions could provide them with the capital needed for expansion and innovation. Sectors like agriculture and construction are projected to reap significant benefits, while service-oriented businesses could experience increased demand due to more disposable income in consumers' pockets. The Future of Economic Policy and Growth As we evaluate the landscape for OBBBA's effects on the economy, it remains clear that policymakers face the challenge of navigating fiscal responsibility while fostering growth. The interplay between tax cuts, technological progress, and tariff constraints will shape the economic fabric of the coming years. The OBBBA is not just about cutting taxes; it’s about transforming the economic strategy for years to come. To embrace the best potential outcomes, businesses and individuals must stay informed about these changes and adapt accordingly.

01.21.2026

Why North Carolina Does Not Need Higher Local Taxes for Growth

Update Why North Carolina's Local Tax Structure is SufficientIn recent years, North Carolina has demonstrated a remarkable economic growth trajectory, leading to a significant rise in local tax revenues without needing to impose additional taxes on its citizens. Thanks to careful tax reforms implemented since 2013, local governments have benefited from a robust increase in their revenues, primarily driven by sales taxes, property taxes, and a broader tax base that continues to grow at a rate surpassing inflation and population growth.Understanding the Growth in Local RevenuesLocal spending in North Carolina has surged, fueled by a thriving economy marked by a steady population increase from about 9.9 million in 2013 to nearly 11 million in 2023. This influx is primarily due to the state's attractive business environment, particularly in evolving sectors such as tech, healthcare, and financial services. In this context, there is no pressing need for local governments to raise taxes when they are already capitalizing on expanding sales, property, and income from existing tax structures.The Misconception of the Need for Higher TaxesSome policymakers may argue that higher taxes are necessary to cover increased local expenditures. However, this perspective overlooks the reality that local governments are already generating adequate revenue through existing frameworks. Recent reports indicate that local-source revenue has grown significantly faster than both population and inflation combined since fiscal year 2013. This suggests that North Carolina's local tax authority is not only sufficient but thriving under current conditions.Future Implications of Maintaining Current Tax LevelsKeeping tax rates stable could lead to further economic growth, as lower taxes enhance the overall business climate, encouraging more entrepreneurs and families to settle in North Carolina. Future predictions suggest that maintaining the current tax structure could continue to support this favorable trend, ultimately benefiting the community and its residents.A Local Perspective on Fiscal ResponsibilityFor residents, understanding the fiscal health of their local government is crucial. A balanced approach to taxation can lead to better-funded public services without overburdening taxpayers. Since North Carolina has already established a commendable financial footing, the focus should be on optimizing current resources rather than increasing tax burdens.

01.17.2026

How Chile's Weak Capital Allowances Are Stifling Growth Amid Tax Debate

Update Chile’s Structural Tax Challenges Exposed As Chile ushers in a new political era under President José Antonio Kast, the conversation around corporate tax reform is intensifying. Advocated by Kast and his opponent Evelyn Matthei, reducing the corporate tax rate from 27% to 23% is seen as a means to invigorate the economy. However, the issues plaguing Chile's tax system run deeper, revealing a landscape significantly burdened by inadequate capital allowances and an outdated worldwide taxation model. Capital Allowances: A Barrier to Growth One of the most pressing concerns is that Chilean companies are subjected to the worst capital allowances in the developed world. These allowances affect businesses' ability to deduct their investment costs from taxable income, which in an ideal system, would allow for immediate recovery of costs through full expensing. However, the current depreciation schedules stretch deductions over lengthy periods, weakening the incentive for investments that boost productivity and jobs. The Worldwide Tax System: A Competitive Disadvantage Chile stands as one of the few remaining OECD countries operating under a worldwide corporate tax system. This outdated model places Chilean enterprises at a disadvantage in global markets. While competitors in countries with territorial taxation reap the benefits of lower tax burdens on foreign income, Chilean companies still face higher tax rates, which stifles their ability to compete effectively abroad. Future Predictions: A Call for Comprehensive Reform The incoming administration has a unique opportunity to shift this paradigm by enacting reforms that include full expensing incentives and an immediate transition to a territorial tax system. By adopting such measures, Chile could significantly lower the tax cost of capital investment while enhancing its competitive edge in the global market. To facilitate meaningful change, policymakers must recognize that cutting the corporate tax rate is merely a band-aid solution. The real gains will come from creating a taxation framework that encourages investment and innovation. Comprehensive reforms could lead to a healthier economic landscape where both domestic and international investors feel confident and assured. As citizens and stakeholders rally for change, they must consider how tax policies shape not just the health of businesses but the vitality of the national economy as a whole. Engaging in this important dialogue about corporate taxation in Chile is essential to ensuring that the country thrives in the face of modern economic challenges.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*