Add Row

Add Element

update

Kozi Checks & Balances
Media Site Home

update

Add Element

Categories

Add Row

Add Element

update

Kozi Checks & Balances TaxTactics News

update

March 24.2025

2 Minutes Read

Examining North Carolina's Tax Proposal: Will It Truly Help Workers?

North Carolina Capitol building at night with statue, related to tax proposal.

North Carolina's Bold Tax Proposal: A Closer Look

As North Carolina’s House Bill 11 gains momentum, it sparks discussions around tax fairness and equity. The bill, which aims to exempt income taxes on tips, overtime, and certain bonuses, mirrors strategies previously championed by former President Trump. Proponents argue that this will provide much-needed relief for workers in the service industry, but the implications of such a move raise important questions.

Understanding the Impact on Workers

House Bill 11 targets tipped workers like waitstaff and hairstylists, claiming to assist those struggling with their finances. However, only about 125,000 out of 4.9 million workers in the state are in jobs where tipping is customary. This narrow focus overlooks a substantial segment of low-income earners who may not benefit from this tax exemption. For instance, many hardworking North Carolinians who earn a fixed salary or work set hours could end up facing increased tax burdens, creating a situation of unfairness without justification.

Economic Consequences of Favoritism in Tax Policies

A key issue arises when comparing the financial scenarios of two individuals: Tracy, a secretary earning her income solely from wages, and Bob, a waiter who earns a combination of wages and tips. If HB 11 passes, while Tracy’s tax burden remains unchanged, Bob could see a significant reduction in his tax liability, making his situation much more financially favorable. Such preferential treatment not only creates disparities among workers but also disrupts the tax balance necessary for a fair economy.

Looking Ahead: The Risks and Rewards

While the intention behind HB 11 might be to support struggling workers, it risks becoming a flawed policy that rewards certain income types over others arbitrarily. The potential consequences could include a less equitable tax system that inadvertently harms those it aims to help. As this bill progresses, North Carolinians must consider the broader implications of such tax changes, balancing immediate aid with long-term economic health.

Payroll Taxes

Write A Comment

Related Posts All Posts

11.15.2025

The OBBBA: Unpacking the Myth of America's Largest Tax Cut

Update Understanding the OBBBA: A Closer Look at Its Economic ImpactIn the continuing narrative of U.S. tax legislation, the passing of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) in summer 2025 has created significant buzz about its implications for the American economy. Touted by political leaders as one of the largest tax cuts in history, the bill, however, ranks as the sixth-largest when measured against historical benchmarks. This discrepancy calls for a deeper examination of the short and long-term effects of this new law on both citizens and the economy.What does the OBBBA entail?The OBBBA extends many of the provisions from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) while adding new tax cuts, such as reductions on overtime and tips. Critics, however, warn that the benefits are disproportionately geared towards high-income households, who may save rather than spend the additional funds. This is echoed in findings by the Tax Policy Center, indicating that fiscal stimulus from the bill may not significantly stimulate economic growth, a trend observed in various economic analyses.Historical Context of Major Tax CutsOver decades, tax reforms have varied widely in their approach and overall impact on the economy. Major cuts such as the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 and the Revenue Acts of 1945 and 1964 reduced revenue significantly as a share of GDP. However, OBBBA's impact is less pronounced, reducing revenue by about 1.4 percent of GDP over the next decade. This classification frames the OBBBA within a historical context while illustrating how, even with substantial cuts, the federal debt is expected to balloon.Future Predictions: What Lies Ahead for the Economy?As America moves forward under OBBBA, economists predict modest boosts to GDP, with long-term effects largely dependent on subsequent policies that may extend or allow tax cuts to expire after 2028. While an initial bump in consumer spending may occur due to tax refunds, higher tariffs and rising interest rates could temper economic growth. Thus, the economic landscape remains fluid, demanding vigilant scrutiny.The Bigger Picture: Long-term ImplicationsThe projected increase in federal debt by $4.2 trillion through 2034 poses significant questions regarding fiscal responsibility and the sustainability of these tax cuts. Despite temporary relief and cash infusion into the economy, there remains a possibility that debt will require urgent future adjustments. Balancing current investments through tax cuts with future fiscal health is a tightrope that may affect not just the economy but also the financial well-being of millions of Americans.Takeaway: Navigating the New Tax LandscapeAs the OBBBA reshapes the tax landscape, understanding its implications can empower citizens to make informed decisions about their finances. Staying updated on how these policies unfold will be crucial for long-term financial health, prompting individuals and businesses alike to adapt swiftly in an evolving economic landscape.

11.12.2025

Why States Should Preserve R&D Tax Deductions to Boost Corporate Growth

Update Understanding the Importance of R&D Tax Deductions Research and development (R&D) tax deductions are crucial for encouraging innovation within states. By providing businesses the opportunity to fully expense their R&D expenditures, states can create an environment that promotes growth and technological advancements. This approach is not just beneficial for the businesses receiving these benefits; it also contributes to the overall economy by fostering an ecosystem of innovation. Historical Context: R&D Deductions and Corporate Tax Revenue Historically, R&D deductions have been an integral part of corporate tax structures across the United States. From 1954 to 2022, these provisions played a significant role in shaping the corporate landscape, allowing businesses to invest more freely in the innovation that helps drive our economy forward. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 provided new opportunities with a broader tax base and lower rate. Thus, as legislators contemplate changes related to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), it's essential to remember the historical context that underscores the value of maintaining R&D deductions. The Impact of Maintaining R&D Deductions on Local Economy Maintaining R&D deductions can create a domino effect that impacts local economies significantly. When companies are rewarded for investing in innovation, they are more likely to hire local employees, expand operations, and invest in community projects. The potential decline in corporate tax revenue from decoupling R&D deductions may be immediately apparent, but the long-term effects on job creation and local investment are invaluable. Communities benefit when companies in those areas thrive. Counterarguments: The Case for Decoupling Some lawmakers argue that decoupling from the OBBBA’s expensing provisions is necessary to protect corporate tax revenues. They fear that the perceived loss of revenue early on could lead to budget deficits. However, a holistic view reveals that the long-term economic benefits of supporting R&D far outweigh any short-term financial concerns. A robust R&D environment can lead to new technologies and companies that drive tax revenue in the future. Future Predictions: What Lies Ahead Looking forward, the conversation surrounding R&D tax deductions will likely intensify as states continue to balance innovation with fiscal responsibility. As states assess the economic impact of these deductions, the hope is for a consensus that recognizes the pivotal role of innovation in today’s economy. If legislators maintain their commitment to R&D, they may find that their treasuries benefit as new technologies emerge and corporations flourish.

11.11.2025

Cigarette Smuggling: Unpacking the Costly Consequences for States

Update The Price of Smuggling: Billions Lost to States Cigarette smuggling isn't just a crime; it's an ongoing financial crisis for many states across the United States. Over the past 17 years, states have forfeited a staggering $83.8 billion due to this illicit market, with an average loss of roughly $4.93 billion annually. The numbers are particularly concerning for states with high cigarette tax rates; New York stands out as the largest loser, missing out on $21.95 billion in excise tax revenue. California follows closely with $14.27 billion lost. Understanding the Smuggling Dynamics The reasons behind such significant losses relate to the stark differences in tax rates across states. As state taxes rise, smokers often turn to nearby low-tax states, increasing opportunities for smuggling both through individual purchase and organized crime. In fact, California now leads the nation in cigarette smuggling, with approximately 52.5% of cigarettes consumed in the state obtained illegally. The Impact of Counterfeit Goods Compounding the issue are the organized criminal enterprises involved in smuggling. Many of these groups sell counterfeit cigarettes that not only bypass tax revenues but can also pose serious health risks, as these products may contain harmful substances. According to recent reports, illicit markets have flourished when legitimate businesses are burdened by high taxes and regulation, forcing consumers into the arms of criminals. Insights from Neighboring States Interestingly, states like New Hampshire have benefited from smuggling-related revenue, generating over $1 billion since 2007. This highlights that while some states are suffering, others are capitalizing on cross-border shopping dynamics, bringing to light the mixed impact of cigarette taxes. How Policy Affects Smuggling Patterns Focusing on tobacco-related policies, states continue to explore tougher regulations. However, past experiences in California and Massachusetts with flavor bans show that such moves can increase smuggling, as consumers seek out illicit alternatives. It's crucial for policymakers to consider the broader implications of their tax and regulatory environments.

Examining North Carolina's Tax Proposal: Will It Truly Help Workers?

North Carolina's Bold Tax Proposal: A Closer Look

Understanding the Impact on Workers

Economic Consequences of Favoritism in Tax Policies

Looking Ahead: The Risks and Rewards

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title