Add Row
Add Element
Kozi checks and balances
update

Kozi Checks & Balances
Media Site Home

cropper
update
Add Element
  • Categories
    • Kansas Tax Compliance
    • Audit-Proofing Strategies
    • Bookkeeping Basics
    • QuickBooks Optimization
    • Industry Insights
    • Tax Deduction Deep-Dives
    • Local Business Spotlights
    • Payroll Taxes
    • Business Directory
Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update
 Kozi Checks & Balances TaxTactics News 
cropper
update
August 14.2025
2 Minutes Read

Navigating Indirect Tax Transformation: Embracing Change and Technology

Indirect tax transformation meeting with hands over a tablet.

Understanding Indirect Tax Transformation

In an era marked by rapid technological advances and shifting regulatory landscapes, indirect tax transformation is not just a trend—it's a necessity. As tax professionals find themselves adjusting to increasing demands and complexities, particularly in multinational corporations, the call for embracing change resonates louder than ever. According to the latest data from Thomson Reuters Institute, the landscape of indirect tax is evolving, highlighting significant shifts and challenges faced by tax teams worldwide.

Key Drivers Behind the Changes

The survey data from 2024 and 2025 reflects a notable increase in the focus on technology and automation, which surfaced alongside regulatory compliance issues as the foremost challenges for tax professionals. There has been an astonishing jump in anticipated spending on tax technology, escalating from 65% in 2024 to 74% in 2025, marking a pivotal moment for tax teams.

Additionally, the percentage of departments exploring artificial intelligence (AI) tools has risen to 42%, indicating a strong willingness to innovate. While the implementation rate of AI has seen only a modest increase, a significant 88% of tax teams foresee more AI integration within the next five years. This reveals an undeniable momentum towards embracing technology in pursuit of improved operational efficiency.

The Reality Faced by Tax Professionals

Moreover, tax departments in the UK, U.S., and Canada are experiencing mounting operational pressures. A stark rise in challenges associated with process improvements surged from 28% to 40% in just one year, according to reports from the Thomson Reuters Institute. This suggests that professionals in the indirect tax field must adapt to an increasingly complex environment while ensuring compliance with evolving regulations.

The Growing Need for Upskilling

As tax teams scramble to keep pace with these rapid changes, a clear trend emerges: the necessity for upskilling and nimbleness within the workforce. Embracing modern technologies and committing to continual learning will be key for tax professionals aiming to not merely survive but thrive amid the challenges ahead. Upskilling their teams will provide an essential strategic advantage, allowing tax professionals to navigate the landscape's complexities more adeptly.

Looking Ahead: What’s Next for Indirect Tax?

Ultimately, the future of indirect tax lies in a seamless blend of technology and human expertise. Innovation will become a crucial lifeline for tax professionals, as the need to tackle the growing intricacies of global regulations becomes ever more pressing. By understanding these transformations and engaging with emerging technologies, tax teams can transform obstacles into opportunities, positioning themselves for success in a dynamic future.

For those involved in global indirect tax functions, staying informed and adaptable is not just advisable—it is essential. The journey through this transformation will require dedication, creativity, and collaboration to ensure straightforward compliance processes while leveraging innovations for enhanced viability.

Audit-Proofing Strategies

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
09.27.2025

Why ESG Assurance is Crucial for Corporate Credibility and Future Success

Update Understanding the Importance of ESG AssuranceAs corporate responsibility gains traction across industries, the emphasis on transparency in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives is louder than ever. ESG assurance refers to the independent verification of a company’s ESG data, ensuring that stakeholders can trust the information provided about sustainability efforts. This evolving practice is crucial not only for building credibility but also for meeting upcoming regulatory requirements, such as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) that mandates reasonable assurance by 2028.Why Trust in ESG Data MattersInvestors and consumers are demanding more than just promises from companies—they want verifiable facts and figures that denote genuine commitment to sustainability. ESG assurance plays a pivotal role in building this trust by confirming the reliability of data and helping to prevent greenwashing, where companies falsely claim eco-friendliness. For example, a company might tout its reduction in carbon emissions, but without ESG assurance, there is no accountability for that claim. In fact, the lack of proper checks can lead to misinformation, undermining genuine efforts towards sustainability.A Deep Dive into Assurance TypesThere are two primary types of ESG assurance: limited and reasonable. Limited assurance is akin to a basic review—identifying calculation and reporting errors, but it may not look into the details as closely as reasonable assurance, which conducts a comprehensive assessment. The latter involves recalculating data, validating collection methods, and even site visits, making it a more rigorous examination. As regulations tighten, transitioning from limited to reasonable assurance will likely become necessary for companies to enhance their credibility.Preparing for an ESG Assurance AuditAs we approach the 2028 deadline, companies need to get ready for ESG audits. This requires not only gathering accurate data but also ensuring that the methodologies used to collect and report data align with industry standards. Companies should proactively identify potential gaps in their reporting, as this preparation can significantly streamline the auditing process. Resultantly, firms that adopt an anticipatory approach to ESG assurance are likely to experience less difficulty navigating future compliance requirements.The Future of ESG AssuranceLooking ahead, ESG assurance is poised to evolve from a supplementary process into a fundamental aspect of corporate operations. With world economies pushing towards accountability, the market will likely reward transparency. Companies that embrace rigorous ESG assurance processes will not only improve stakeholder trust but may also enhance their overall corporate reputation, helping to attract investments and foster customer loyalty.

09.26.2025

Optimize Your ESG Reporting with Thomson Reuters and SAP's Advanced Tools

Update What Role Does ESG Reporting Play for Multinationals? Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting is becoming a cornerstone for multinational enterprises, especially as the European Union tightens regulations regarding sustainability and corporate transparency. Thomson Reuters and SAP have recognized this crucial need and have stepped up to deliver an integrated reporting solution that simplifies compliance with the new European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). Streamlined ESG Compliance through Advanced Tools The collaboration between Thomson Reuters and SAP aims to transform ESG reporting. Their new tool combines ONESOURCE Statutory Reporting with SAP’s Sustainability Control Tower to automate reporting workflows and enhance data accuracy. This integration ensures companies can easily gather, analyze, and report both financial and non-financial metrics—an essential requirement under the ESRS, which emphasizes the concept of double materiality. Understanding Double Materiality But what exactly does double materiality entail? Essentially, it means that businesses must report not just on financial performance but also on their environmental and social impacts. For example, if a company's operations significantly harm local ecosystems or community wellbeing, this information must be disclosed. This requirement elevates the importance of transparent ESG reporting, pushing companies to focus not only on profits but also on their broader impact. The Benefits of the SAP Endorsement One notable feature of this tool is that it has been endorsed by SAP, a mark of excellence that signifies its alignment with high-quality standards. For existing SAP users, this endorsement ensures compatibility and smooth integration into their operations, making it easier to adopt without significant adjustments. Furthermore, it highlights the tool's reliability and credibility in navigating the intricate landscape of ESG requirements. A Historic Perspective on ESRS Development Understanding the context surrounding the ESRS is vital. The standards have evolved through decades of advocacy for sustainability, shaped by contributions from stakeholders like the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG). Established over the years, key milestones include the initiation of the first Environmental Action Programme in 1973, which laid foundational regulations. These historical insights enhance the current understanding of why comprehensive ESG disclosures are imperative. Future Opportunities with ESG Reporting As ESG reporting continues to gain importance, companies equipped with Thomson Reuters and SAP’s solution are poised to excel in transparency and accountability. Not only does this tool optimize compliance workflows, but it also prepares businesses for upcoming challenges in sustainability reporting. The trend is clear: organizations that prioritize environmental and social governance will stand out in the marketplace. With changing regulations and heightened awareness regarding sustainability, now is the time to embrace advanced ESG reporting solutions. Monitoring your company's impact on the planet and society is not just a regulatory requirement; it’s becoming a competitive advantage.

09.24.2025

Understanding Why SAS 146, SSARS No. 26, and SSAE No. 23 Matter

Update Understanding the Impact of New Audit Standards The audit and assurance landscape is undergoing transformative changes, with a strong emphasis on quality and accountability. Recent updates through the introduction of SAS No. 146, SSARS No. 26, and SSAE No. 23 highlight the importance of maintaining high engagement standards for audit and accounting professionals. For firms aiming to stay competitive and credible, grasping these shifts is not merely a compliance exercise; it represents an opportunity to enhance trust and integrity in their operations. SAS No. 146: Elevating Engagement Quality SAS No. 146 introduces a new framework for quality management tailored for audit engagements. This updated standard replaces previous requirements and aligns closely with broader firm-level quality management protocols. Crucially, it delineates the responsibilities of engagement partners and asserts the engagement partner’s role as instrumental in ensuring audit quality. Being effectively involved at every stage of the audit enhances both the oversight and execution of the process, ultimately leading to more reliable outcomes. SSARS No. 26: A New Approach to Accounting and Review Services SSARS No. 26 brings a modern perspective to quality management within review, compilation, and preparation engagements. Just like SAS 146, it reinforces the engagement partner’s responsibility to deliver quality results. This holistic approach not only improves accountability but also enhances collaboration within teams, making sure everyone involved understands quality expectations and their roles in achieving them. SSAE No. 23: Clarifying Attestation Standards The introduction of SSAE No. 23 signifies amendments to attestation standards to ensure consistency with current AICPA quality management guidelines. This standard aims to clarify engagement partner responsibilities, which involves enhanced documentation requirements. By doing so, SSAE 23 facilitates greater transparency and trustworthiness in the attestation process, essential qualities in today’s auditing environment. Why These Standards Matter The integration of SAS 146, SSARS 26, and SSAE 23 indicates a shift towards heightened quality assurance in the auditing sphere. Implementing these standards can significantly benefit firms by not only fulfilling regulatory obligations but also by establishing a distinguished brand known for integrity and reliability. This commitment to maintaining high engagement quality can foster trust, paving the way for sustained business relationships and enhanced client satisfaction. Next Steps for Audit Firms To navigate these changes effectively, audit firms must begin by educating their staff about the new standards. Developing training materials and conducting workshops can provide clarity on responsibilities and expectations. Additionally, firms should reassess internal processes to ensure alignment with the latest guidelines, making adjustments as necessary. Adopting these proactive measures will position firms for success in the evolving audit landscape. As the landscape of auditing transforms, the importance of adapting to new standards such as SAS 146, SSARS No. 26, and SSAE No. 23 cannot be overstated. For firms ready to lead in this charged environment, embracing these updates will be key to sustaining accountability and trust.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*