Add Row
Add Element
Kozi checks and balances
update

Kozi Checks & Balances
Media Site Home

cropper
update
Add Element
  • Categories
    • Kansas Tax Compliance
    • Audit-Proofing Strategies
    • Bookkeeping Basics
    • QuickBooks Optimization
    • Industry Insights
    • Tax Deduction Deep-Dives
    • Local Business Spotlights
    • Payroll Taxes
    • Business Directory
Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update
 Kozi Checks & Balances TaxTactics News 
cropper
update
March 04.2025
2 Minutes Read

EVs and the Highway Trust Fund: Key Insights and Future Solutions

Traffic on highway related to Highway Trust Fund and Electric Vehicles.

Understanding the Highway Trust Fund's Challenges

The Highway Trust Fund (HTF) faces significant fiscal challenges as highway expenditures now surpass its primary revenue sources. With expenditures projected to reach a staggering $270 billion in deficits from 2025 to 2034, it’s clear that traditional funding mechanisms, notably the gas tax, are in dire need of reevaluation. This is largely due to two factors: the gas tax, last adjusted in 1993, has lost much of its purchasing power to inflation, and there’s a growing trend of vehicle fuel efficiency and electric vehicle adoption — leading to diminished contributions to the HTF through fossil fuel consumption. Today, many electric vehicles (EVs) operate on roads constructed with funds from gas taxes which they themselves do not contribute to.

What is the Fair SHARE Act?

In response to these challenges, the Fair SHARE Act has been proposed to impose a one-time $1,000 fee on new EV sales and a $550 fee on heavy battery modules. This proposal attempts to bridge the revenue gap caused by the lack of contributions from electric vehicles. Though this measure aligns with the average gas taxes paid over ten years — approximately $1,000 per driver — many critics view it as a simplistic and insufficient fix. Unlike the usage-based gas tax which adjusts with miles driven, this flat fee does not account for varying patterns of vehicle use.

The Future of Transportation Funding

As states implement alternative funding strategies, including the mileage-based user fees, experts believe a more sustainable solution lies in adopting a Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) tax. This funding model would levy charges based on the actual road usage rather than fuel consumption, addressing the growing issue presented by the rise of EVs. This approach would ensure that every driver contributes fairly to maintenance and upkeep costs based on how much they actually utilize the road network.

EVs: Driving New Conversations Around Funding

The increasing penetration of electric vehicles underscores a critical shift in how we think about transportation funding. While there is broad support for infrastructure improvements, many Americans are becoming more open to discussions about increased contributions to the HTF, even if those discussions involve new taxes. Polling suggests that people are willing to pay more if it means minimizing traffic and vehicle maintenance costs.

The Urgency of Reform

The lack of dedicated long-term funding sources for the Highway Trust Fund puts future transportation infrastructure at risk. With projections showing the HTF may run dry as early as 2028, it’s evident that decisive action is required. Each state has a stake in crafting a solution that requires contributions from all road users, including owners of electric vehicles. The question remains: how will lawmakers respond to these pressing challenges in the coming years?

Payroll Taxes

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
10.30.2025

Illinois Unrealized Gains Tax: Rapid Legislation with Huge Consequences

Update Unrealized Gains Tax: A Controversial Proposal on the Fast Track In the midst of a hectic legislative session, Illinois lawmakers have taken the unusual step of pushing forward the Extremely High Wealth Mark-to-Market Tax Act, set to impose a 4.95% tax on unrealized gains of billionaires. This tax, which targets assets that haven’t been sold and thus aren’t liquid cash, could have a profound impact not just on wealth distribution but also on the state’s economy moving forward. The Mechanics of the Proposed Tax This proposal aims to tax a wide range of assets, including stocks, bonds, and even stakes in private businesses. Billionaires would be required to pay taxes annually on these assets based on their current market value, regardless of whether they’ve made any actual profit from selling them. Consider a tech entrepreneur who has a company worth over a billion dollars; if that’s on paper but the business isn’t yet profitable, they would still owe taxes on that paper wealth. This raises significant questions about liquidity and the real financial strain such a tax might impose on business owners. How Does This Affect Investment? The swift passage of this legislation in under 48 hours could precipitate a seismic shift in investment dynamics in Illinois. With the possibility of taxing paper gains, wealthier residents may be incentivized to relocate to states with less burdensome tax regimes. Already, experts anticipate that a significant uptick in taxpayer migration could follow the enactment of the unrealized gains tax, further depleting state revenues over the long run. Moreover, businesses may curtail their growth initiatives out of fear that new taxes could outpace their earnings. A Complex Taxation System The Illinois constitution prohibits taxing personal property, meaning that this tax is being presented as an income tax. Many argue that while capital gains are typically viewed as income once realized, taxing them before they are even sold introduces a host of complications—not least of which is that it could lead to over-taxation due to inflation. Essentially, taxpayers would be charged on gains that haven't yet been realized as income, a move that has never been employed in any tax system globally. With intrinsic challenges in assessing the real value of privately held and intangible assets, the tax collectors could face substantial difficulties in the practical administration of this tax. Community Impact and Future Implications This proposed tax, while targeting billionaires, could have unforeseen consequences for local communities and the economy at large. Wealthy residents contribute significantly to state and local revenues. Should they choose to relocate, not only could the state see a drop in significant tax revenues, it might also impact charitable contributions and community investments that help many grassroots initiatives thrive. Conclusion: Why You Should Care The implications of the mark-to-market tax in Illinois extend beyond the state’s billionaires. This taxation model could redefine economic engagement and investment strategies. Understanding these changes is crucial for residents who might be affected directly or indirectly. If you're invested in Illinois' economic future, keep a close eye on this critical discussion, as the implications of this proposed tax could alter the local landscape for years to come.

10.24.2025

Texas Proposition 9 Seeks to Empower Small Businesses with Tax Exemption

Update Texas Proposition 9: A Step Toward Empowering Small BusinessIn the realm of property taxes, growing concerns over the burdens placed on local businesses have prompted innovative legislative actions. A significant focus is now on Texas Proposition 9, which aims to amend the state constitution to increase the personal property tax exemption to $125,000 for small businesses. This measure reflects a growing recognition of the need to support small and mid-sized businesses, a vital segment of Texas's economy.Understanding the Impact of Personal Property TaxesProperty taxes are a primary funding source for state and local governments in the U.S., assisting in financing essential services such as education and public safety. However, the taxation of personal property, which includes tangible items like equipment and machinery, places an additional burden on businesses, particularly smaller entities without extensive resources.Bridging the Gap: Reducing Compliance BurdensThe current Texas law allows only a small exemption of $2,500 for business personal property. By moving to a more generous $125,000 exemption, Proposition 9 aims to alleviate the intricate compliance requirements and costs that small businesses often cannot afford. As highlighted in a study from Connecticut, such exemptions can profoundly impact businesses: a mere $10,000 exemption could relieve 46% of businesses while minimally affecting overall tax revenues.Lessons from Other StatesSimilar reforms in states like Indiana and Rhode Island have paved the way for Texas to consider more competitive tax structures. Indiana's recent increase in its tangible personal property exemption from $20,000 to $40,000 saw significant relief without greatly affecting tax revenues. These examples illustrate the potential benefits of amending Texas's tax framework to favor small businesses.Conclusion: A Promising Vote AheadThe impending vote on Proposition 9, set for November 4, 2025, encourages voters to consider the vital role small businesses play in the state's economy. By voting in favor of this measure, Texans have an opportunity to ease the financial burdens on local businesses, fostering an environment where they can thrive and contribute more dynamically to their communities. This initiative not only aims to boost the economy but also to strengthen the fabric of Texas's local communities.

10.23.2025

Exploring the Impact of OBBBA on America's Progressive Tax System

Update The Progressive Shift of the Tax Landscape Post-OBBBA The recent passing of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) has brought notable changes to the U.S. federal tax system, marking a pivotal moment in tax policy that emphasizes a more progressive approach. This legislation not only modifies existing tax structures but also signals a broader commitment to redistributing wealth across different income levels. Increased After-Tax Income for Most Taxpayers The OBBBA has been designed to benefit taxpayers across the income spectrum, with projections indicating that after-tax incomes for various groups will see upticks in the coming years. For instance, on average, taxpayers can expect a 2.9 percent increase in 2025 and a 5.4 percent increase in 2026 in their after-tax income due to the new provisions, which include the permanence of individual tax cuts introduced in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). However, the benefit is not uniform. While higher-income earners in the top quintile will see gains, their increases will taper compared to middle and lower-income earners. For example, the fourth quintile is expected to experience a 6.3 percent increase by 2026, while the top quintile will only see a rise of 5.0 percent. This trend emphasizes the OBBBA's design as a progressive tax reform aimed at enhancing economic equity. Redistribution Through New Deductions The OBBBA also introduces new deductions aimed at specific demographic groups, including seniors and workers receiving overtime pay and tips. These provisions are significant in maintaining a degree of equity within the tax system, as they target relief for various lower and middle-income brackets. Such targeted measures ensure that the benefits of the tax reforms reach those who may be more economically vulnerable, reflecting the overarching goal of wealth redistribution. Complications Arise Amid Progressive Intent However, the OBBBA also adds layers of complexity to the tax system. While simplifying some elements of the tax code by making previous cuts permanent, it also complicates others, particularly in terms of new deductions and credits, resulting in potentially increased compliance costs for taxpayers. As states analyze their tax structures in light of OBBBA, many will need to make adjustments that could lead to confusion and inconsistency among state tax codes. Taxpayers across the nation must now stay informed about these changes and their implications for both federal and state tax requirements. Activating individuals and businesses on the importance of understanding these modifications can result in greater engagement and compliance within the community. Ultimately, while the OBBBA’s intent appears geared towards nurturing a fairer tax landscape, its execution may necessitate significant navigation for taxpayers. Concluding Thoughts on the OBBBA’s Impact The heart of the OBBBA revolves around its progressive ambitions; it could signal a renewed focus on supporting the middle and lower classes while also emphasizing the need for clarity and consistency within tax frameworks. As this law continues to shape the economic landscape, both state and federal policymakers will have to ensure that the complexity introduced does not overshadow the beneficial aspects of a more equitable tax system.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*