Add Row
Add Element
Kozi checks and balances
update

Kozi Checks & Balances
Media Site Home

cropper
update
Add Element
  • Categories
    • Kansas Tax Compliance
    • Audit-Proofing Strategies
    • Bookkeeping Basics
    • QuickBooks Optimization
    • Industry Insights
    • Tax Deduction Deep-Dives
    • Local Business Spotlights
    • Payroll Taxes
    • Business Directory
Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update
 Kozi Checks & Balances TaxTactics News 
cropper
update
November 04.2025
3 Minutes Read

2026 State Tax Competitiveness Index Reveals Winners and Losers

Movers and Shakers in the 2026 State Tax Competitiveness Index

Tax Rankings: A Tool for State Competitiveness

The newly released 2026 State Tax Competitiveness Index highlights the significant shifts in state tax rankings over the past six years, providing critical insight into how these changes affect economic growth and business attraction. Produced by the Tax Foundation, the Index serves as a comprehensive benchmarking tool for policymakers, taxpayers, and business leaders to evaluate the effectiveness of their states' tax systems.

States on the Rise: Who’s Leading the Charge?

This year's Index identifies several states that have made remarkable improvements in their tax structural efficiency since 2020. Tennessee demonstrates the most impressive surge, climbing from 38th place to 8th place. This leap can be attributed to a series of reforms, including the elimination of its tax on individual interest and dividends, effectively positioning Tennessee as one of only eight states without an individual income tax.

Iowa also marks a significant turnaround, moving from 43rd to 17th. The state has taken substantial steps toward tax reform, such as reducing its top corporate income tax rate and simplifying its tax brackets. Consequently, the individual income tax rates saw a dramatic drop, fostering a more competitive environment.

Georgia and Louisiana have also made commendable strides, both in reducing corporate and personal income tax rates, thus enhancing their attractiveness to businesses. Arkansas has seen similar improvements, showcasing a commitment to tax reform that strengthens its position in the Index.

States Facing Challenges: A Cautionary Tale

Conversely, states that have fallen behind present a stark contrast. Oregon, once ranked 8th, plummeted to 35th, signaling potential risks associated with failing to adapt to evolving tax expectations. Washington's newly implemented capital gains tax has drastically impacted its tax ranking, illustrating how rapid changes can lead to significant declines in competitiveness. Similarly, Colorado has faced challenges, remaining stagnant without adopting necessary reforms in areas like tax structure simplification, highlighting the critical need for ongoing assessment and adaptation.

The Importance of Tax System Structure

The Index underscores the idea that a well-structured tax system is essential not only for attracting businesses but also for promoting sustainable economic growth. States that avoid taxing major income types or maintain low rates on crucial business taxes often see a direct correlation with economic prosperity. Conversely, excessive taxation—especially on business inputs—can lead to detrimental economic distortions.

With the landscape of taxation continuously evolving, the findings of the 2026 State Tax Competitiveness Index serve as a vital roadmap for state policies. Policymakers are encouraged to analyze these rankings strategically to foster environments conducive to economic vitality and resilience.

Moving Forward: Strategies for Improvement

For any state lagging behind, an opportunity for growth lies in understanding the Index’s evaluations. By prioritizing tax competitiveness reform, state leaders can create strategies aimed at improving their rankings, reinforcing the point that well-structured, low-rate tax systems contribute positively to businesses and the larger economy. The 2026 Index acts not only as a measure of where states currently stand but also as a clarion call for proactive legislative action.

Payroll Taxes

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
12.19.2025

How State Taxation Influences Data Center Investments Today

Update Understanding State Taxation for Data Centers As the digital landscape transforms, the importance of data centers has surged, fueled by emerging technologies like AI and cloud computing. These facilities not only drive significant investment but also face a complex web of state taxation, influencing where they choose to set up operations. Why Taxation Matters for Data Centers The decision on where to locate a data center often hinges on tax burdens and incentives. Each state adopts different tax structures that can either attract or deter investments. States may impose heavy property taxes on machinery and equipment, which make up over 20% of the total tax burden in some regions. This can dissuade companies from establishing their operations in places where the tax framework is less favorable. Comparative Analysis of Tax Incentives Several states have developed specific tax incentives aimed at attracting data center investments. For example, Virginia offers tax exemptions for equipment used in data centers, while states like Texas provide varying lengths of property tax abatements contingent upon the company's total investment. The minimum investment thresholds can vary significantly from state to state; Illinois, for instance, requires $250 million for exemptions, whereas Maryland only requires $2 million. The Growing Demand for Data Centers Anticipated investments in data centers are predicted to exceed $1 trillion over the next five years. The “hyperscalers”—the technology giants that dominate the sector—are projected to require an additional $1.8 trillion in capital by 2030. This indicates a strong growth trajectory, but the choice of states for these investments can't be taken lightly; optimal conditions, including favorable tax codes, are essential for data centers to thrive. Implications for Local Governments State tax policies around data centers not only impact corporate decision-making but also local economies. While data centers contribute substantially to state and local coffers, a poorly structured tax code can lead companies to choose other locations, depriving local governments of vital revenue streams. Hence, lawmakers must closely evaluate their tax regimes to promote sustainable growth in this critical sector.

12.18.2025

How the Latest International Tax Competitiveness Index Reflects Economic Shifts

Update International Tax Competitiveness Index: A Look at the Top Movers The recently released 2025 International Tax Competitiveness Index has generated significant discussion about the taxation landscape across various countries. Over the past decade, several nations have made remarkable strides in reforming their tax systems, fostering robust economic environments conducive to investment and growth. Spotlight on Investing Nations Among the five countries that demonstrated substantial improvements in their rankings from 2014 to 2025, the United States stands out, rising from 29th to 14th. This leap can be attributed to major tax reforms carried out in 2017, which included reductions in both corporate and personal income tax rates as well as a shift towards a territorial tax system. The 2025 extension of full expensing for certain assets under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) highlights the ongoing commitment to maintaining a competitive tax structure that encourages investment. Canada has also made significant advancements, climbing from 25th to 13th place. The country has lowered its consumption tax burden while enhancing its capital investment through provisions for full expensing and accelerated depreciation tailored to stimulate long-term growth. The benefits of these administrative changes are palpable as Canada continues to attract new capital investments. Surprisingly Declining Countries On the flip side, Colombia has seen a dramatic decline in its ranking, plummeting from 24th to 36th. Various factors contributed to this downturn, including a less favorable corporate tax environment and high tax rates disincentivizing investment. Similarly, Poland and Belgium have experienced declines, reflecting concerns about their corporate tax policies' effectiveness in fostering economic growth. Effective Reforms Lead to Economic Improvements Countries like Greece and Hungary have implemented targeted reforms that have proven successful in enhancing their respective International Tax Competitiveness Index scores. Greece improved its standing from 30th to 23rd by broadening its VAT base and lowering the corporate income tax rate, creating a more inviting atmosphere for foreign investments. Hungary’s flat 9% corporate tax rate remains the lowest within the OECD, solidifying its reputation as an attractive country for investment. Future of Tax Reform: The Impact on Global Economy The International Tax Competitiveness Index showcases the importance of tax policy as a driver of economic growth. As nations look towards future reforms, the ability to create a competitive tax environment is becoming increasingly critical. Globally, countries are also reevaluating their international tax agreements and strategies in response to changing economic conditions, setting the stage for continued evolution in this arena. Continuous efforts to evaluate and reform tax systems yield insights for countries aiming to boost competitiveness and economic resilience. Policymakers must navigate complex global pressures while ensuring domestic tax systems remain robust and adaptable to meet emerging economic challenges. The Role of Taxation in Economic Growth Tax systems directly affect business decisions, investment flows, and economic health. A competitive index serves not only as a motivational tool for countries but also reflects existing economic policies’ effectiveness. Countries striving for better rankings can set an example for others as they adopt more effective tax measures, benefitting global economic landscapes.

12.16.2025

Can Excise Taxes Truly Replace Property Taxes? An In-Depth Analysis

Update Why Excise Taxes Cannot Fill the Gap Left by Property Tax DeclinesIn the landscape of burgeoning local tax debates set for 2026, one truth remains steadfast: excise taxes cannot feasibly replace property taxes. As housing prices in the U.S. have surged, the impact on local governments’ revenue streams from property taxes has become more significant, particularly in states like Nebraska, where proposed tax reforms are riding on the need to address skyrocketing property values.From January 2020 to July 2025, average home prices rose by a striking 55.9%, which outpaced wages and inflation—an alarming trend that homeowners dread as they anticipate rising property taxes. It’s crucial to recognize that property taxes are the backbone of local governmental revenue, representing around 70% of all local tax collections and exceeding income tax revenues by a large margin.The Inadequacy of Excise TaxesFaced with potential shortfalls, states are considering increasing excise taxes—levies on specific goods like tobacco, gasoline, and alcohol—as alternatives to property taxes. However, the data shows an inherent problem: excise taxes have a narrow base and are traditionally volatile, fluctuating with market cycles and consumer preferences. For instance, Nebraska's cigarette tax managed only $52 million in revenue last year, a far cry from the $5.3 billion raised through property taxes.This gap highlights that the alternative revenues from excise taxes cannot bridge the substantial funding requirements needed for essential local services such as education and public safety. With the steady decline in excise tax receipts, especially related to shrinking tobacco use, the viability of this approach is highly questionable. As reported, real cigarette revenues in Nebraska dropped two-thirds since their peak 50 years ago.Community Services at RiskMunicipalities depend on these essential services to function. As property taxes provide critical funding for schools, police, and fire departments, any attempts to replace such a crucial revenue source with excise taxes represent a shortsighted solution likely to endanger community services. Homeowners may welcome lower property taxes, but they must understand the consequences of such drastic tax replacement strategies.The overall lesson is clear: for local governments to maintain stability and have adequate funding for vital services, property taxes should not only remain but be treated with the importance they merit during these debates. The conversation must shift toward efficiently managing property taxes rather than replacing them with less stable revenue generators.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*